USPTO serial 75417206
BIOTA SEPTIC PURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 24, 2001
- Examiner
- COFIELD, JULIA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BIOTA SEPTIC PURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Enviro-Zyme International, Inc.
Stormville, NY
TOLEDO, OH
Enviro-Zyme International, Inc.
Stormville, NY
Enviro-Zyme International, Inc.
Stormville, NY
BELOIT, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW J. HEINISCH
ANDREW J. HEINISCH REINHART BOERNER VAN DEUREN PC2215 PERRYGREEN WAYROCKFORD, IL 61107UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | bacterial culture/enzyme product that is used to maintain septic systems, cesspools, dry wells and all subsurface systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Enviro-Zyme International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BETCO CORPORATION, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Enviro-Zyme International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Enviro-Zyme International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ENVIRO-ZYME INTERNATIONAL LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named BIOTA SEPTIC PURE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 22, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |