Drawing for PAXNET

USPTO serial 75417413

PAXNET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PAXNET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN S HALE

JOHN S HALE GIPPLE & HALE667-B OLD DOMINION DRMCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ON LINE RELIGIOUS ARTICLES SCRIPTURE QUOTES AND COMMENTARY AND PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF RELIGION VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 20, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 21, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 4, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 21, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 15, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 19, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 20, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance