USPTO serial 75417563
BOTTOMLINE.TOMORROW.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BOTTOMLINE.TOMORROW.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT P HART
ROBERT P HART HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES INC8500 BALBOA BLVDNORTHRDIGE, CA 91329UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Boardroom, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Boardroom, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BOTTOMLINE.TOMORROW.COM
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 22, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 16, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |