USPTO serial 75417578
TINDALLCAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAIN, CATHERINE P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TINDALLCAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD M MOOSE
RICHARD M MOOSE DORITY & MANNING, PAP O BOX 1449GREENVILLE, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Precast and prestressed concrete pieces for building, namely, insulated wall panels | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Precast and prestressed concrete pieces for building, namely, concrete walls, decking, beams, parking garage decks and wall panels, spandrels, wall panels, ceiling panels, bridge supports and beams | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 26, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |