USPTO serial 75417615
THE STANDARD IN NETWORK DEFRAGMENTATION AND INCREASED SYSTEM PERFORMANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2254583Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 15, 1999
- Examiner
- BONNET, ODETTE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE STANDARD IN NETWORK DEFRAGMENTATION AND INCREASED SYSTEM PERFORMANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey G. Sheldon
Jeffrey G. Sheldon Sheldon Mak Rose & Anderson PC100 Corson Street, Third FloorPasadena, CA 91103-3842UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs for use in computer system management, namely, defragmenting, consolidating, and moving data files to improve system performance | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 17, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EXECUTIVE SOFTWARE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EXECUTIVE SOFTWARE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DISKEEPER CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named THE STANDARD IN NETWORK DEFRAGMENTATION AND INCREASED SYSTEM PERFORMANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2010 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2005 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2005 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 19, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 11, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |