USPTO serial 75417619
SKETCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOWARD, CHERYL L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKETCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Incline Village, NV
Incline Village, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
REX B STRATTON
REX B STRATTON STRATTON BALLEW PLLC1313 SEATTLE TWR1218 3RD AVESEATTLE, WA 98101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Motion picture and television films featuring live action and/or animated cartoons; prerecorded records, audio and audio-video tapes, cassettes, and discs featuring live action and/or animated cartoons; Prerecorded cassettes featuring live action and/or animated cartoons used with hand-held viewers or projectors; Audio, video, audio and video tape, cassette, disc playback and recording machines featuring live action and/or animated cartoons; Radios; Eye-glasses and sunglasses and cases therefor; Parlor-type computer game; Computer game cartridges; Coin or non-coin operated video output game machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 28, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 14, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |