USPTO serial 75417649
HUSMAN'S HUSMAN SNACK FOODS AN AGRILINKBUSINESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 30, 2001
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HUSMAN'S HUSMAN SNACK FOODS AN AGRILINKBUSINESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ROCHESTER, NY
Wilmington, DE
Wilmington, DE
Wilmington, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN B SALAI
STEPHEN B SALAI HARTER, SECREST & EMERY LLP1600 BAUSCH & LOMB PLROCHESTER, NY 14604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Flavored and unflavored potato chips; shelf stable dips; cheese dip; hot french fried potatoes; cheese french fried potatoes; pork rinds; salted peanuts and cashews; kippered beef; jerky | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BIRDS EYE FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LINDEN OAKS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by LINDEN OAKS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by LINDEN OAKS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named HUSMAN'S HUSMAN SNACK FOODS AN AGRILINKBUSINESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 3, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2000 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |