CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for AMS

USPTO serial 75417704

AMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5955722Status 702Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 7, 2020
Examiner
DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with AMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

B. Brett Heavner

B. Brett Heavner Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP901 New York Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20001United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Development of new pharmaceuticals [ , victuals with pharmaceutical effects and other homeopathic products ] for others; new product development consulting services; consulting in the field of the development, establishment, and execution of [ physical, ] drug [ and alternative medicine therapy ] programs, and safety and efficacy testing of such programs for others; (Based on 44(e)) Scientific and industrial research, in particular medical, bacteriological or chemical research; services of medical, bacteriological or chemical laboratories; all afore mentioned services not for the treatment of antibody deficiency syndromeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 28, 2025NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2025C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 28, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 22, 2025E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2025REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2020R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 30, 2019SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2019CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Nov 1, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 16, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 16, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2019CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2019SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 22, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 18, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 17, 2019IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 17, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 17, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 17, 2019EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 17, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 15, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 13, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 11, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 11, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 18, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 16, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 18, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 14, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 14, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 17, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 22, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 2, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 6, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 15, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 9, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2016ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2016MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 12, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 12, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2015GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2015GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2015CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 16, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 1, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 19, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 11, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 11, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 7, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 7, 2013ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 28, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 8, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 8, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 26, 2012ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 13, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 24, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 3, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 3, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 2, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 1, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 10, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 8, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 8, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 11, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 11, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 11, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2007GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 5, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 3, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 9, 2006GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 9, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 6, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 8, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 25, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2004GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 14, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 1, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 2001CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 8, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 27, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2000CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 24, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance