USPTO serial 75417706
AGRILINK FOODS A PROCESSING AND MARKETING COOPERATIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AGRILINK FOODS A PROCESSING AND MARKETING COOPERATIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN B SALAI
STEPHEN B SALAI HARTER, SECREST & EMERY LLP1600 BAUSCH & LOMB PLROCHESTER, NY 14604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | potato chips, kettle potato chips, flavored potato chips, namely, barbecue flavored chips, Cajun flavored potato chips, salt and vinegar flavored potato chips, Coney Island flavored potato chips, cheese and garlic flavored potato chips, sour cream and onion flavored potato chips, jalapeno pepper flavored potato chips; and refrigerated chip dip; preserved, dried, cooked or frozen fruits and vegetables; soups; jellies; fruit sauces; dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fats; meat extracts; baking jams and fruit preserves; canned fruits; canned soup; canned vegetables; fruit compotes and fillings for cakes and pies; frozen coconuts; fruit toppings; fruit based glazes; fruit based fillings for pies; sauerkraut; peanut butter; chili, chili with beans, turkey chili, onion chili, lima beans with ham, onion chili with beans, cheddar cheese chili with beans, turkey chili, beef stew, corned beef hash, pickles, processed peppers, mayonnaise, non-dairy salad dressing, dairy based salad dressing, refrigerated dips, namely, chip dip, vegetable dip, bacon and onion dip, ranch dip, dill dip, French onion dip, garlic dip, avocado dip, clam dip, cheese dip, and guacamole dip; shelf stable microwave entrees consisting primarily of meat and/or vegetables, namely, beef stew, chili with beans, chicken and vegetables with pasta, clam chowder, cheddar cheese chili, scalloped potatoes and ham; shelf stable dips; seasoned French fried potatoes; cheese French fried potatoes; pork rinds; salted peanuts and cashews; kippered beef; jerky; and non-dairy chip dips | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Flavored tortilla chips, namely, jalapeno flavored tortilla chips, and nacho cheese flavored tortilla chips; beef tamales in sauce, three cheese lasagna, relish, beef ravioli, macaroni and cheese, mustard, horseradish mustard, table syrup; preparations made from cereals, namely, cereal based snack foots; prepared entrees consisting primarily of pasta with chicken; sauces, namely, salsa, tartar sauce, and seafood sauce; snack foods, namely, butter toffee caramel corn with almonds and pecans, pretzels, tortilla chips, corn chips, cheese flavored waffles; brownies; cookies, crackers; pretzels, baked and fried extruded cheese snacks, popped popcorn, fried pork rinds, tortilla chips, cheese flavored puffed corn snacks, puffed corn snacks, popped popcorn, flavored popped popcorn, namely, seasoned popcorn, cheddar cheese flavored popcorn, caramel popcorn with and without peanuts; and snack mix consisting primarily of pretzels, crackers and/or popped popcorn; microwave popcorn, puddings; salad dressings; ketchup; food flavorings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LINDEN OAKS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by LINDEN OAKS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named AGRILINK FOODS A PROCESSING AND MARKETING COOPERATIVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 3, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 6, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 22, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |