USPTO serial 75417793
PRINCESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3557901Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 6, 2009
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRINCESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PRINCESS HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES B.V.
4818 PA Breda, NL
Other trademarks owned by PRINCESS HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES B.V.
PRINCESS HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES B.V.
4818 PA Breda, NL
Other trademarks owned by PRINCESS HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES B.V.
PRINCESS HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES B.V.
4818 PA Breda, NL
Other trademarks owned by PRINCESS HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES B.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Sacoff
Robert W. Sacoff PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD & GERALDS200 S. WACKER DR STE 2900CHICAGO, IL 60606-6631UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PRINCESS HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by PRINCESS HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by PRINCESS HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named PRINCESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 4, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 15, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 26, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 17, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |