USPTO serial 75417988
TELEMUSICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TELEMUSICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HELEN D REAVIS
HELEN D REAVIS SCAROLA & REAVES888 7TH AVE 45TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Preparing audio-visual presentations for use in advertising, featuring primarily Latin-American entertainment personalities and Latin-American products and services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2004 | PR.W | PETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 13, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 21, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |