USPTO serial 75418008
ISUZU GOLD STAR CERTIFIED USED TRUCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3169017Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 7, 2006
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ISUZU GOLD STAR CERTIFIED USED TRUCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Whittier, CA
Isuzu Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
Shinagawa-Ku, Tokyo, JP
Isuzu Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
Shinagawa-Ku, Tokyo, JP
Isuzu Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
Shinagawa-Ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Alumit
John Alumit Patel & Alumit, PC16830 Ventura Blvd., Suite 360Encino, CA 91436UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Motor vehicles, namely, trucks and structural parts therefor | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by American Isuzu Motors Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Isuzu Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by Isuzu Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by Isuzu Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named ISUZU GOLD STAR CERTIFIED USED TRUCK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2011 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 24, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 24, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |