Drawing for NEUROGEL

USPTO serial 75418613

NEUROGEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEUROGEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard G. Slavit

HOWARD G. SLAVIT SAUL EWING, LLP2600 VIRGINIA AVE NWSTE 1000WASHINGTON, DC 20037-1922

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010bio-medical surgical implantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 1, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 30, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 29, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 29, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 6, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 5, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 5, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 5, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 5, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 5, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 29, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 24, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 23, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 23, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 6, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 12, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 4, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 2, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 20, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2007ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Aug 24, 2007CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 23, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 24, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 7, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 30, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 29, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 29, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 14, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 13, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 15, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 14, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 9, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 29, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 11, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 23, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 11, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2001CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 17, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2000CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 8, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 8, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance