USPTO serial 75419307
THE FUTURE BELONGS TO THE EFFICIENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE FUTURE BELONGS TO THE EFFICIENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Underbalanced Drilling Systems Limited
Calgary, Alberta T29 2X6, CA
Other trademarks owned by Underbalanced Drilling Systems Limited
Underbalanced Drilling Systems Limited
Calgary, Alberta T29 2X6, CA
Other trademarks owned by Underbalanced Drilling Systems Limited
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES W MCKEE
JAMES W MCKEE FAY SHARPE BEALL FAGAN MINNICH & MCKEE1100 SUPERIOR AVE 7TH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Underbalanced Drilling Systems Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Underbalanced Drilling Systems Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named THE FUTURE BELONGS TO THE EFFICIENT
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 10, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 19, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 23, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |