USPTO serial 75419409
VES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROSEMARY S. TARLTON
ROSEMARY S TARLTON MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET ST FL 30SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 200 | indicating membership in applicant organization which is an association of visual effects professionals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 7, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 1, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |