USPTO serial 75419520
THEODORE TUGBOAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THEODORE TUGBOAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sonja Keith
Sonja Keith Classic Media, Inc.860 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Intent to Use) Magnets; (Based on 44(e)) pre-recorded video tapes featuring children's programming; (Based on Intent to Use) motion picture films for theatrical and television use featuring children's programming; pre-recorded audio and video magnetic tapes in cartridges and cassettes featuring children's programs; pre-recorded compact discs featuring children's programming; pre-recorded audio cassettes featuring storytelling; optical viewers with three dimensional graphic representations; (Based on 44(e)) computer CD-ROM programs featuring children's programming; (Based on Intent to Use) sunglasses, eyeglasses, video game machines for use with television, computer game cartridges and cassettes, computer game programs and tapes, video games in cartridges and cassettes | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | (Based on Intent to Use) sleepwear, namely pajamas, sleep shirt, robes, coats and jackets, shirts and tops, (Based on 44(e)) t-shirts, (Based on Intent to Use) sweatshirts and sweat pants, shorts, caps and hats, gloves, suspenders, skirts, trousers, jeans, hosiery, underwear, dresses, rompers, overalls, shoes, boots, and slippers, cloth bibs, belts, bonnets, cloth diapers, headbands, mittens, neckties, swim suits, Halloween costumes, shirts | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | (Based on 44(e)) Entertainment, namely, continuing children's shows distributed over television and computer via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CLASSIC MEDIA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by COCHRAN ENTERTAINMENT INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by CLASSIC MEDIA, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named THEODORE TUGBOAT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 12, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 7, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |