USPTO serial 75419526
SCHOOL-ADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCHOOL-ADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Capistrano Beach, CA
Capistrano Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WALTER G MAXWELL
WALTER G MAXWELL CHRISTIE PARKER & HALE LLPP O BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DOWNLOADABLE PRINTED PUBLICATIONS DEVOTED TO NUTRITIONAL RESEARCH, FOOD PRODUCT DEVELOPMENTS, AND INFORMATION RELATING TO IMPROVING THE LEARNING SKILLS AND BEHAVIOR OF CHILDREN THROUGH NUTRITION | ACTIVE | Jul 5, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 13, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |