USPTO serial 75419677
SPEED'AIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AURINI, GEOFFREY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPEED'AIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
51200 Epernay, FR
51200 Epernay, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD N HUFF
DONALD N HUFF DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC1300 I ST N W THIRD FL W, WA 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | POWER-OPERATED SPRAYERS AND SPRAYING NOZZLES THEREFOR FOR USE IN AGRICULTURAL, HORTICULTURAL AND VITICULTURAL ENVIRONMENTS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 6, 1999 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 5, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 1998 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |