USPTO serial 75419838
VIPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN K FITZGERALD
JOHN K FITZGERALD FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT LLPHOWARD HUGHES CTR6060 CTR DR 10TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game software; prerecorded CD-ROM compact discs featuring computer games; accessories for hand-held units for playing electronic computer games, namely, computer game joysticks and manuals therefore sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed manuals and strategy guides featuring computer games, combat and warfare for game players | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing on-line entertainment in the field of games, namely flight simulators, combat and warfare simulators | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NovaLogic, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NovaLogic, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named VIPER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 1, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 24, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 15, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |