USPTO serial 75419909
LEGSTICK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HETZEL, DANNEAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEGSTICK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ottawa, Ontario K1G 4R7, CA
Ottawa, Ontario K1G 4R7, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely, eye shadow, mascara, lipstick, nail polish, nail polish remover, bath oil, bath gel, bath crystals, skin lotion, bubble bath, perfumes, eau de toilette, bath soaps, men's cologne; skin care products, namely, creams for cellulite reduction and foundation makeup; men's after shave lotion; hair care products, namely, shampoos, conditioners, gels, mousse, hair colorant, permanent wave preparations, and hair spray; sun tan products, namely, sun screens and sun tan oils; massage oils, personal deodorants; clay products, namely, face and body mud creams; dental hygiene products, namely, toothpaste and mouthwash; hair removing wax and wax impregnated cloth strips or rolls for hair removal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 13, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 13, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 18, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 7, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 13, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 27, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |