Drawing for QUESTCOAT

USPTO serial 75420087

QUESTCOAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUESTCOAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Inga Regenass

INGA REGENASS HOLLAND & HART LLP555 17TH ST STE 3200P O BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Amorphous, conductive, and non-stick coating for use on scissors, knives, drill bits, reamers, saw blades, pliers, end mills, wire cutters, precision coining dies, rollers, pins, screws, bore gauges, stamp metal forming tools, extrusion dies, spool lips for spinning reels, counter bores, taps broaches, gear cutters, bearing bushings gears, splines, actuators, push rods, cams, cam shafts, hobs, punches, valve stems, router bits, engine parts, blanking dies, resistance welding electrodes, scrapers, gouges, countersinks, counterbores, silicon wafers and chips, pump plungers, embroidery needles, VLSI semiconductors, compressor blades/vanes, jewelry, door hardware, writing instruments, eyeglass frames, shafts and seals, dental instruments and devices, food processing equipment, key duplicators, forming dies, cutting tools, granulator blades, powdered metal dies, seaming rolls, burnishers, engravers, minting devices, razor blades, toy components, umbrellas, optical fibers, integrated circuits, video/audio tapes, computer floppy disks, packaging, solar cells, kitchen utensils, window panes, golf clubs, bicycle components, reflectors, spark plugs, lamp shades, key chains, piston rings, fluid pumps, super conducting thin films, photo diodes, light emitting diodes, diode lasers, electrodes, electrochemical cells, thermolytic coolers, nuclear fuel pellets, magnetic recording media and heads, fluid valves, solenoids, disk drives, circuits to provide protection from electromagnetic interference EMI, circuit boards, belts, footwear, UV adhesives, tubing, casters, filters, paper products, actuators, belts, fishing equipment, integrated circuits, audio/video equipment and media, kitchen utensils such as pots and pans, plastic gears, and razor bladesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2002DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 25, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 25, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 2, 2002DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 28, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 29, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 6, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 23, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 18, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 11, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance