USPTO serial 75420190
EZ GUIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EZ GUIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS R VIGIL
THOMAS R VIGIL VIGIL & ASSOC836 S NW HWYBARRINGTON, IL 60010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computerized information display device comprising a visual display screen and computer software for providing information on television programs or for accessing such information from an on-line global computer network and displaying same on said visual display screen | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 3, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 21, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |