Drawing for SALESLAN THE CALL CENTRE IN-A-BOX

USPTO serial 75420398

SALESLAN THE CALL CENTRE IN-A-BOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SALESLAN THE CALL CENTRE IN-A-BOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GEZA C ZIEGLER JR

GEZA C ZIEGLER JR FRYDMAN BECK KING & ARAD LLP950 3RD AVE 18TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER TELEPHONY INTEGRATED CALL CENTER SYSTEM FEATURING INTERACTIVE VOICE RESPONSE UNIT, VOICE MAIL, AUTOMATIC CALL DISTRIBUTOR, SCRIP TING TOOL, RELATIONAL DATABASE MANAGEMENT AND PREVIEW AND PREDICTIVE DIALER, COMPRISING COMPUTER INTERFACE DEVICES, TELEPHONE INTERFACE DEVICES, COMMUNICATION AND TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS, NAMELY, PC SERVERS CAPABLE OF RUNNING GRAPHICAL USER OPERATING SYSTEMS, PC OPERATING SYSTEMS, INTEGRATED TELEPHONY BOARDS, COMPUTER TELEPHONY BOARDS, AND VOICE OVER GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK PROTOCOL, COMMUNICATION AND TELECOMMUNICATION COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE FOR OPERATING THE CALL CENTERACTIVENov 1, 1997
038COMMUNICATION AND TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES NAMELY, TELEPHONY INTEGRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPUTER CENTRE SWITCH SYSTEMSACTIVENov 1, 1997
042COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, INTEGRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPUTER CENTER SWITCH SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; LEASING TIME TO AN INTERACTIVE COMPUTER DATA BASE IN THE FIELD OF SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENTACTIVENov 1, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 30, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 19, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance