USPTO serial 75420408
SAND SPRAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 9, 2001
- Examiner
- DONINGER, CHRISTOPHER G
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SAND SPRAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Inver Grove Heights, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carol N. Skinner
CAROL N SKINNER SKINNER & ASSOCIATES212 COMMERCIAL STHUDSON, WI 54016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Coloring agents, namely, paints and dyes for coloring sand and for arts and crafts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 12, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 26, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |