USPTO serial 75420815
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
42277 Wuppertal, DE
42277 Wuppertal, DE
42277 Wuppertal, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRIEDRICH KUEFFNER
FRIEDRICH KUEFFNER FRIEDRICH KUEFFNER PC342 MADISON AVE STE 1921NEW YORK, NY 10173UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | GOODS IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS FOR TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHERWEAR, SHOES, SPORTS ARTICLES, NAMELY, FORGE-PROOF SECURITY THREADS; DETECTORS FOR FORGE-PROOF ELEMENTS, TRANSPONDERS, MAGNETIC STRIPES, AND BANDS PROVIDED WITH BAR CODES; ELECTRONIC ARTICLE-SAFEGUARD (EAS) SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS FOR TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHERWEAR, SHOES, SPORTS ARTICLES, NAMELY, TRANSPONDERS AND MAGNETIC STRIPES, BANDS, LABELS, INSIGNIA, TRIMMING AND APPLIQUES, AS WELL AS DETECTORS FOR TRANSPONDERS AND MAGNETIC STRIPES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | INSTALLATION AND REPAIR OF SAFEGUARDING SYSTEMS DESIGNED TO DETECT FRAUDULENT GOODS; INSTALLATION AND REPAIR OF ELECTRONIC ARTICLE-SAFEGUARD SYSTEMS; INSTALLATION AND REPAIR OF ELECTRONIC GOODS IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | TRAINING IN THE USE AND OPERATION OF SAFEGUARDING SYSTEMS DESIGNED TO DETECT FRAUDULENT GOODS, TRAINING IN THE USE AND OPERATION OF ARTICLE-SAFEGUARD SYSTEMS, TRAINING IN THE USE AND OPERATION OF ELECTRONIC GOODS IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | ENGINEERING IN THE FIELD OF SAFEGUARDING SYSTEMS DESIGNED TO DETECT FRAUDULENT GOODS, CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF SAFEGUARDING SYSTEMS DESIGNED TO DETECT FRAUDULENT GOODS, ENGINEERING IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONIC ARTICLE-SAFEGUARD SYSTEMS, CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONIC ARTICLE-SAFEGUARD SYSTEMS, ENGINEERING IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONIC GOODS IDENTIFICATION SECURITY SYSTEMS, CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONIC GOODS IDENTIFICATION SECURITY SYSTEMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 30, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 3, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |