USPTO serial 75420881
NOISEREDUCER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NOISEREDUCER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN L BORST
STEPHEN L BORST BOX NO 15138SAINT-GOBAIN CORPWORCESTER, MA 01615-0138UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | FACED ACOUSTICAL FIBERGLASS INSULATION BATTS FOR WOODSTUD RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION APPLICATIONS | ABANDONED | May 26, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1998 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 1998 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Jun 8, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |