USPTO serial 75420905
SUNTEK MOIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUNTEK MOIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Piscataway, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ZHIYU HU
100 PLAINFIELD AVE STE 6EDISON, NJ 08817UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Multiple Ophthalmic Imaging System (abbreviated as "MOIS") is computerized medical device for ophthalmic diagnosis. The MOIS includes slit lamps, fundus camera, some ophthalmic acquisition units,computer system and related computer software for data and image acquiring, processing, analyzing, interpreting, storing, retrieving, reporting, transferring and database managing; computer systems comprised of personal computer hardware, like computer monitors, scanners, networking devices, printers, etc. | ACTIVE | Jul 10, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2000 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |