Drawing for DEPFA

USPTO serial 75421368

DEPFA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
β€”
Examiner
ROSSMAN, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEPFA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID TOREN

KATRIN LEWERTOFF SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP787 7TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Rent accounting; profitability analysis; financial accounting; electronic data processing for house building companiesACTIVEβ€”
036apartment house management; fiduciary management of rental dwellings and condominiums; financial services, namely, granting and managing public sector loans, mortgage loans and business loans; property purchasing and development loans; financing services for modernization and reconstruction of structures; business refinancing services, including issuing mortgage bonds, secured and unsecured debentures and promissory notes; real estate management; real estate investment; real estate listing; real estate syndication; real estate trustee services; real estate appraisal; real estate brokerage; real estate equity sharing, namely, managing and arranging for co-ownership of real estate; real estate escrow services; acquisition and brokerage of real property and mortgages; financial consulting services; real property valuation; housing agency servicesACTIVEβ€”
037Planning and construction of buildings; real estate site selectionACTIVEβ€”
042Designing computer software programs in the fields of accounting for othersACTIVEβ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited Β§2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVEDβ€”
May 24, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 24, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVEDβ€”
Dec 10, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTEDβ€”
Nov 20, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTEDβ€”
Aug 30, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVEDβ€”
Aug 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVEDβ€”
Jul 31, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVEDβ€”
Jul 9, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 12, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILEDβ€”
Mar 7, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTEDβ€”
Nov 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERβ€”
Oct 12, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILEDβ€”
Apr 30, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTEDβ€”
Apr 9, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILEDβ€”
Jan 3, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTEDβ€”
Oct 12, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILEDβ€”
Apr 3, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDβ€”
Feb 2, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDβ€”
Oct 12, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline β€” usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 20, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 18, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONβ€”
Mar 26, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERβ€”
Mar 24, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILEDβ€”
Jan 20, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEβ€”
Nov 5, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERβ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance