USPTO serial 75422013
CARPET- & RUGTRONIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 14, 2001
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CARPET- & RUGTRONIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
B-8510 Kortrijk-Marke, BE
B-8510 Kortrijk-Marke, BE
B-8510 Kortrijk-Marke, BE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES C WRAY
1493 CHAIN BRIDGE RD STE 300MCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Textile machines, namely, textile weaving machines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by N.V. Michel Van de Wiele
- Other trademarks owned by N.V. Michel Van de Wiele
- Other trademarks owned by N.V. Michel Van de Wiele
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named CARPET- & RUGTRONIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 30, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 20, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 9, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |