USPTO serial 75422555
1-800-CREDITCARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THAYER, GARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 1-800-CREDITCARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AMY C SCALISE
AMY C SCALISE MUCH SHELIST FREED DENENBERG AMENT BELL& RUBENSTEIN PC200 N LASALLE ST STE 2100CHICAGO, IL 60601-1095Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Consumer credit card services in the nature of providing information which allows consumers to evaluate various credit card options, namely by researching the best credit rates, matching consumer credit card preferences to existing credit card programs, facilitating and preparing credit card applications, and obtaining instant on-line credit approval for consumers from various companies and financial institutions | ACTIVE | Apr 5, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 29, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |