Drawing for STOKO VITAN

USPTO serial 75423116

STOKO VITAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENZMILLER, ANDREW
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STOKO VITAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID C PURDUE

DAVID C PURDUE PURDUE LAW OFFICE2735 N HOLLAND-SYLVANIA RD STE B-2TOLEDO, OH 43615-1844UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Skin care products, namely, skin creams, skin lotions, skin oils, skin gels, skin cleansers and skin emollients; hand preparations, namely, hand creams, hand lotions and hand cleaners; skin soaps; and detergents, soaps, essential oils and sunscreens, for use as an ingredient in the manufacture of skin care preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 28, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance