USPTO serial 75423164
BETAMAG FORTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, TERESA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BETAMAG FORTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-48157 Munster, DE
D-48157 Munster, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD J MCKENNA
RICHARD J MCKENNA FOLEY & LARDNER777 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202-5367UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | feed supplements for livestock and domestic pets, including horses, dogs and cats; animal feed additive for use as a nutritional supplement | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 11, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 31, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |