USPTO serial 75423220
ORICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2570523Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 21, 2002
- Examiner
- LUTHEY, LYNN A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ORICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MELBOURNE, VICTORIA, 3000, AU
MELBOURNE, VICTORIA, 3000, AU
ICI Australia Operations Proprietary Limited
Victoria, 3000, AU
Other trademarks owned by ICI Australia Operations Proprietary Limited
MELBOURNE, VICTORIA, 3000, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura T. Geyer
Laura T. Geyer Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLPP.O. Box 2255IPLaw@VorysColumbus, OH 43216-2255Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICALS USED IN THE MANUFACTURE OF [ FERTILIZERS, CROP PROTECTION PRODUCTS, DISPERSANTS, ] SURFACTANTS, [COATING MATERIALS, PAINTS, ENAMELS, LACQUERS, ADHESIVES, POWDER COATINGS, BLEACHING PREPARATIONS, CLEANING, POLISHING, SCOURING AND ABRASIVE PREPARATIONS], EXPLOSIVES AND EXPLOSIVES COMPOSITIONS,[ UNPROCESSED PLASTICS, ] ARTIFICIAL RESINS, SYNTHETIC RESINS, ION EXCHANGE RESINS HAVING MAGNETIC PROPERTIES, ALL OF THE FOREGOING RESINS FOR USE IN POTABLE WATER AND WASTE WATER TREATMENT, [ FOOD PROCESSING, ] BIOTECHNOLOGY, EXTRACTION OF MATERIALS FROM INDUSTRIAL AND ORE PROCESSING APPLICATIONS, ION EXCHANGE APPLICATIONS, [ PAINTS, ENAMELS, LACQUERS, ADHESIVES, POWDER COATINGS, AND BLEACHING PREPARATIONS; OXIDIZING SALTS FOR USE IN EXPLOSIVES AND FERTILIZERS; WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS FOR TREATMENT OF WASTE WATER AND POTABLE WATER ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ORICA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by ORICA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by ICI Australia Operations Proprietary Limited
- Other trademarks owned by ORICA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named ORICA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 21, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | RPRC | NOTE OF REPLACEMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 4, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 4, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 22, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | RDEN | NOTE OF REPLACEMENT DENIED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | RFIL | REQUEST FOR REPLACEMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 21, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 1, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |