Drawing for DIAMOND LOYALTY

USPTO serial 75423851

DIAMOND LOYALTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BECK, LORETTA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIAMOND LOYALTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jess M. Collen

Jess M. Collen Practus, LLP100 South Bedford Road, Suite 328Mount Kisco, NY 10549United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009magnetically encoded and machine-readable cards with coded information including financial information, magnetically encoded and machine-readable cards programmable to obtain and store information; magnetically encoded debit cards, credit cards, and bankers cardsACTIVE—
016blank paper tapes and cards for recording computer programs, debit cards without magnetic coding, credit cards and voucher booksACTIVE—
035promoting the sale of credit card accounts by awarding purchase points through the use of incentive award programs in the nature of savings cards, vouchers, and gift vouchersACTIVE—
036financial services and bankers card services, namely, credit card and debit card servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 22, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2025ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Dec 22, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 28, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 11, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Mar 22, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 22, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 17, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 24, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 3, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 15, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 4, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 4, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 11, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 10, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 27, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 23, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance