USPTO serial 75423851
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
Jess M. Collen Practus, LLP100 South Bedford Road, Suite 328Mount Kisco, NY 10549United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | magnetically encoded and machine-readable cards with coded information including financial information, magnetically encoded and machine-readable cards programmable to obtain and store information; magnetically encoded debit cards, credit cards, and bankers cards | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | blank paper tapes and cards for recording computer programs, debit cards without magnetic coding, credit cards and voucher books | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | promoting the sale of credit card accounts by awarding purchase points through the use of incentive award programs in the nature of savings cards, vouchers, and gift vouchers | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | financial services and bankers card services, namely, credit card and debit card services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2025 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Dec 22, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 28, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |