USPTO serial 75424208
HEMP NUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2936480Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 29, 2005
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HEMP NUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mother Earth Enterprises, Inc.
Los Angeles, CA
Mother Earth Enterprises, Inc.
Los Angeles, CA
Mother Earth Enterprises, Inc.
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SEYAMACK KOURETCHIAN
Seyamack Kouretchian Coast Law Group LLP1140 S Coast Highway 101Encinitas, CA 92024UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | ice cream bars, and ready to eat nutritional food bars | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mother Earth Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Mother Earth Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Mother Earth Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named HEMP NUT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |