USPTO serial 75424511
COHIBA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COHIBA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL I SANTUCCI
HECTOR CAPO760 SW 21ST RDMIAMI, FL 33129UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee | ABANDONED | Jan 21, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |