USPTO serial 75424824
BILLSENSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BILLSENSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Burnsville, MN
Burnsville, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STUART R HEMPHILL
STUART R HEMPHILL DORSEY & WHITNEY LLPPILLSBURY CTR S220 S 6TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in electronic processing, transmission, presentment and payment of bills | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 8, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 23, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |