USPTO serial 75425118
PASTA COSI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PASTA COSI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMIE J. FITZGERALD
JAMIE J FITZGERALD CUMMINGS & LOCKWOODP O BOX 1960NEW HAVEN, CT 06509-1960UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Pasta Sauces, namely, tomato-based sauces | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |