USPTO serial 75425323
BLISS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 1, 2005
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with BLISS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, US
New York, NY, CA
NEW YORK, NY, US
NEW YORK, NY, US
New York, NY, CA
NEW YORK, NY, US
New York, NY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sarah M. Robertson
Sarah M. Robertson Dorsey & Whitney LLP51 West 52nd StreetNew York, NY 10019-6119United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | [ EYE MAKEUP, ] HAIR CARE [ AND NON-MEDICATED SCALP CARE ] PREPARATIONS, HAIR SHAMPOO, FOOT CREAM, [ PERFUME, COLOGNE, (( EAU DE TOILETTE )) SCENTED BODY SPRAY, SUN BLOCK, BODY OIL ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BLISS PRODUCTS HOLDINGS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Kilgore, Marcia
- Other trademarks owned by BLISS WORLD LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BLISS WORLD LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Kilgore, Marcia
- Other trademarks owned by BLISS WORLD LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Bliss Trademark Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named BLISS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2026 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2026 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 2, 2026 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 2, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2025 | NURC | NOTICE OF UPDATED REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 1, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2024 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2024 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Mar 25, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2023 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 27, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2019 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| May 6, 2019 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| May 2, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 22, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 22, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 29, 2013 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 19, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 22, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |