USPTO serial 75425324
SPA BY NUMBER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HANKIN, NANCY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPA BY NUMBER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID EHRLICH
DAVID EHRLICH FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics for professional use as facial or body treatments, namely, skin clarifiers, cleansers, cream emollients, lighteners, lotion, masks, moisturizer, scrubs, soap and toners, body firming gels and lotions, body cream, emulsions, masks and scrubs, foot cream, exfoliating body scrubs, self-tanning skin preparations, cuticle conditioners, body oil, facial cleansers, creams, emulsions, masks and scrubs, skin masks containing seaweed | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | health spa services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kilgore, Marcia
- Other trademarks owned by BLISS WORLD LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BLISS WORLD LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SPA BY NUMBER
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 22, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |