Drawing for 1-800-FLORALS

USPTO serial 75425331

1-800-FLORALS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 1-800-FLORALS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CLAY A. TILLACK

CLAY A TILLACK SCHIFF HARDIN & WAITE6600 SEARS TWRCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035retail florist services provided via retail stores, via telephone, and via a global computer networkACTIVENov 4, 1992
042floricultural and horticultural servicesACTIVENov 4, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 6, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 6, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 5, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 13, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 1, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 20, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 26, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance