USPTO serial 75425396
JANKEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JANKEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NTT Software Kabushiki Kaisha,
Yokohama-shi Kanagawa, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARTHUR SCHWARTZ
ARTHUR SCHWARTZ FOLEY & LARDNERP O BOX 25696WASHINGTON, DC 20007-8696UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer operating programs; computer operating system software to operate computers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer consultation; computer dating services; computer diagnostic services; computer disaster recovery planning; leasing of computer facilities; computer programming for others; on-line batch computer services; computer site design; up-dating of computer software; computer software design for others; computer time-sharing services; leasing of computers; rental of computers; rental of computers and software; design of computer for others; computer services, namely, providing on-line facilities for real time interaction with other computer users concerning topics of general interest; computer services, namely, providing a computer bulletin board in the fields of entertainment, games, music, sports, movies, dating services, personal advertisements, and employment opportunities on a global computer network; computer services, namely, providing on-line facilities for real-time interaction with other computer users with a feature of deciding turns among users; computer services, namely, providing on-line facilities for real-time interaction with other computer users with a feature of deciding turns among users, via games; computer services, namely providing on-line facilities for real-time interaction with other computer users with a feature of deciding turns among users, via dice game; computer services, namely, providing election/lottery services among users on a global computer network; computer services, namely providing election services on a global computer network with a feature for users to elect a chairman; computer services, namely, providing lottery services on a global computer network with a feature for deciding prizes by lottery among users; computer dating or computer matching services in the nature of computerized matching of groups on a global computer network, computerized matching of groups of compatible users by personal histories, common linkings and purposes, and providing information about user activities on a global computer network; computer services, namely, providing on-line management services about utilization state or conditions of a computer bulletin board, computer chatting and computer network conference services by users on a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |