USPTO serial 75425409
PLAYCODE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAKER, CHRISTINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLAYCODE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. FRANKLIN ROTHWELL
G FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ROTHWELL FIGG ERNST & MANBECK PC555 13TH ST NW STE 701WASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INTERACTIVE VIDEO-GAMES COMPRISED OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS; INTERACTIVE AUDIO-VISUAL GAME DISKS CONTAINING RECEIVERS OF AUDIO TRANSMISSIONS FROM OTHER AUDIO AND AUDIO-VISUAL SOURCES ALL FOR USE AS ACTION AND EDUCATIONAL GAMES | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | GAMES AND TOYS, NAMELY, PLUSH TOYS, DOLLS, ACTION FIGURES, TOY VEHICLES, ELECTRIC ACTION TOYS, HAND-HELD UNIT FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES, STUFFED TOYS, AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR CONTAINING RECEIVERS OF AUDIO TRANSMISSIONS FROM OTHER AUDIO AND AUDIO/VISUAL SOURCES THAT FEATURE INTERACTIVE MOVEMENT, CHARACTERISTICS AND/OR SPEECH | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ONLINE INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GAMES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Aris Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by VERANCE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by VERANCE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named PLAYCODE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 5, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 24, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |