USPTO serial 75425521
SUNDANCE CHANNEL PICTURES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUNDANCE CHANNEL PICTURES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NORMAN ZAFMAN
NORMAN ZAFMAN BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD 17TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Television broadcasting featuring the exhibition of independent films; video on demand transmission services over broadcast television, cable television and pay television in the field of independent films | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | cable television programming services in connection with the exhibition of independent films; a continuing series of television programs featuring independent films | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sundance Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sundance Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SUNDANCE CHANNEL PICTURES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 2, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |