USPTO serial 75425571
NUTRIENT INFUSION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NUTRIENT INFUSION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTIN F MAJESTIC
MARTIN F MAJESTIC MAJESTIC PARSONS SIEBERT & HSUE PCFOUR EMBARCADERO CTR STE 1100SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4106UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SKIN CARE, BEAUTY CARE AND HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS AND COSMETICS, NAMELY, ALPHA-HYDROXY-BASED SKIN PREPARATIONS, BATH GEL, BATH AND BODY OIL, BLUSHER, BODY LOTION, BODY POWDER, BUBBLE BATH, CELLULITE REDUCING CREAMS, CLARIFIER, CLEANSING BAR, CLEANSING CREAM, CLEANSING GEL, CLEANSING LOTION, COLOGNE, COMPACTS, CONDITIONING CLEANSER, COVERSTICK, SKIN CREAM, DEODORANT, EMOLLIENT, EYE CREAM, EXFOLIATOR, FACE LOTION, FACE POWDER, COSMETIC ASTRINGENTS, FOUNDATION MAKEUP, HAIR CONDITIONER, HAIR COLORING PREPARATIONS, HAIR GEL, HAIR LOTION, HAIR SHAMPOO, HAIR SPRAY, HAIR STYLING PREPARATIONS, LIP CONDITIONER, LIP HIGHLIGHTER, LIP LINER, LIPSTICK, MAKEUP REMOVER, MASCARA, MASQUE, PERFUME, SELF TANNING LOTION, SHAVING GEL, SHOWER GEL, SKIN BALANCER, SKIN LOTION, SKIN AND BODY MOISTURIZER, SKIN TONER, SOAP-FREE CLEANSER, SOAP-FREE CLEANSING BAR, SUNSCREENS, SUN BLOCKS AND SKIN PATCHES USED TO DETERMINE SKIN TYPE FOR NON-MEDICAL COSMETIC USE | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | SALICYCLIC-BASED SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS FOR PROBLEM SKIN | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |