USPTO serial 75426320
WHIRLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WHIRLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North York, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
COLLEEN FLYNN GOSS
COLLEEN FLYNN GOSS FAY SHARPE BEALL FAGAN MINNICH & MCKEE1100 SUPERIOR AVE 7TH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS COMPOSED OF VALVES, PUMPING AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT FOR THE SUPPLY OF WATER TO WHIRLPOOL SYSTEMS FOR USE IN WHIRLPOOLS, HOT TUBS AND SPAS; WATER CIRCULATORS FOR USE IN WHIRLPOOLS, HOT TUBS AND SPAS; WATER CIRCULATION AND CLEANING SYSTEMS COMPOSED OF VALVING, PUMPS, PLUMBING AND JETS FOR USE IN WHIRLPOOLS, HOT TUBS AND SPAS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |