CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for Serial No. 75426503

USPTO serial 75426503

Serial No. 75426503

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 602
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with Serial No. 75426503?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID TOREN

KATRIN LEWERTOFF SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP787 7TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY, DISTILLED SPIRITS AND LIQUEURSACTIVENov 30, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 11, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 9, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 9, 2004CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 22, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 30, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 30, 2004EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Oct 8, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 30, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 30, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 8, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 14, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 25, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 19, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 29, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance