USPTO serial 75426760
GREEN BELT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GREEN BELT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARVIN A GLAZER
MARVIN A GLAZER CAHILL SUTTON & THOMAS155 PARK ONE2141 E HIGHLAND AVEPHOENIX, AZ 85016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, classes, seminars, workshops, and training sessions in the field of quality control, business performance, and business management | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 24, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 22, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 22, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |