USPTO serial 75426981
WEST PALM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEST PALM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario M5V 1M3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CYNTHIA K NICHOLSON
CYNTHIA K NICHOLSON FOLEY & LARDNERP O BOX 25696WASHINGTON, DC 20007-8696UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, swimwear, T-shirts, blouses, pants, jeans, shorts, skirts, dresses, sweaters, pullovers, sweatshirts, sweatpants, socks, stocking, leggings; outerwear, namely, jackets, coats, sport coats, wintercoats; fashion accessories, namely, belts; shoes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |