USPTO serial 75427021
LIQUID ENDURANCE SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIQUID ENDURANCE SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bloomfield, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STUART J SINDER
STUART J SINDER KENYON & KENYON1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | "DIETARY AND NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS"; | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |